Free Essays on Innocence Vs. Experience As Seen Through Two Literary Works

A central theme for the works of many authors is innocence and experience. This is shown in Neil Gaiman’s Neverwhere and James Morrow’s City of Truth where the protagonists give up their innocence for experience. By breaking innocence the protagonists discover places they never knew existed and, thereby, benefit from the experience that they gain. In the novel Neverwhere by Neil Gaiman, the protagonist, Richard Mayhew, lives a dull and routine life. That is until one night while strolling the streets of London he finds a strange girl bleeding and decides to help. From then on he becomes exposed to a world he never knew existed. He discovers the true underworld of London in the shadowy crevices of the sewers, rooftops, and subway trains and those that live in this dreary, enigmatic existence. The innocence of his old life is now broken because of the discovery of this new realm. Through the encounters and experiences he faces he finds love, adventure, and himself in the end. Through this we learn that through experience we may be able to grow as people for the better. James Morrow’s City of Truth is set in a world without lies and falsehoods of any kind. Th people in it have become conditioned to the truth; no matter how brutal it may be. Jack Sperry, the main character, is forced to learn how to lie after his son contracts a rare disease. Jack believes in an experimental theory of healing he comes upon that is based on a placebo-like method where Jack’s son is put in an environment where he does not know he is at all ill and through this he should become better. To execute this theory Jack is faced with the conflict of learning how to lie which is forbidden. In his search to find a way to lie Jack comes upon a rebellious group against the government that have attained the art of lying. With their assistance Jack shed’s his innocence and learns to lie as well and makes it possible to save his son. From this book we ca... Free Essays on Innocence Vs. Experience As Seen Through Two Literary Works Free Essays on Innocence Vs. Experience As Seen Through Two Literary Works A central theme for the works of many authors is innocence and experience. This is shown in Neil Gaiman’s Neverwhere and James Morrow’s City of Truth where the protagonists give up their innocence for experience. By breaking innocence the protagonists discover places they never knew existed and, thereby, benefit from the experience that they gain. In the novel Neverwhere by Neil Gaiman, the protagonist, Richard Mayhew, lives a dull and routine life. That is until one night while strolling the streets of London he finds a strange girl bleeding and decides to help. From then on he becomes exposed to a world he never knew existed. He discovers the true underworld of London in the shadowy crevices of the sewers, rooftops, and subway trains and those that live in this dreary, enigmatic existence. The innocence of his old life is now broken because of the discovery of this new realm. Through the encounters and experiences he faces he finds love, adventure, and himself in the end. Through this we learn that through experience we may be able to grow as people for the better. James Morrow’s City of Truth is set in a world without lies and falsehoods of any kind. Th people in it have become conditioned to the truth; no matter how brutal it may be. Jack Sperry, the main character, is forced to learn how to lie after his son contracts a rare disease. Jack believes in an experimental theory of healing he comes upon that is based on a placebo-like method where Jack’s son is put in an environment where he does not know he is at all ill and through this he should become better. To execute this theory Jack is faced with the conflict of learning how to lie which is forbidden. In his search to find a way to lie Jack comes upon a rebellious group against the government that have attained the art of lying. With their assistance Jack shed’s his innocence and learns to lie as well and makes it possible to save his son. From this book we ca...

Crapulence Doesnt Mean That

Crapulence Doesnt Mean That Crapulence Doesnt Mean That Crapulence Doesnt Mean That By Maeve Maddox A reader called my attention to a sentence in which these words appeared: a cesspool of its own crapulence I turned to my browser and found so many examples of wallowing in their/his/its own crapulence that I conclude that the expression has already become a clichà ©. Apparently a lot of people imagine that crapulence means excrement. Columnist Jonah Goldberg thinks so: Two decades of crapulence by the political class has been prologue to the era of coprophagy that is now upon us. It is crap sandwiches for as far as the eye can see. Actually, crapulence and its related forms crapulent and crapulous, come from a Latin word meaning intoxication. and have to do with drunkenness. crapulence: great intemperance especially in drinking Merriam-Webster crapulence: 1. Sickness or indisposition resulting from excess in drinking or eating; 2. Gross intemperance, esp. in drinking; debauchery. OED crapulous: sick from too much drinking, from L. crapula, from Gk. kraipale hangover, drunken headache, nausea from debauching. The Romans used it for drunkenness itself. English has used it in both senses. Online Etymology Dictionary The vulgarism crap, on the other hand, is used as a noun to mean excrement, and as a verb to mean defecate. Merriam-Webster gives the etymology of crap as: Middle English, from Middle Dutch crap, crappe pork chop, greaves [cracklings], grain in chaff, from crappen to tear or break off The use of crap with excremental associations has been in the language since the 19th century. The Online Etymology Dictionary indicates that crap belongs to a cluster of words generally applied to things cast off or discarded (e.g. weeds growing among corn (1425), residue from renderings (1490s) dregs of beer or ale The OEtyD entry concludes that the word probably comes from the Middle English word crappe, grain that was trodden underfoot in a barn. In case the meaning of coprophagy in the quotation above is not evident from the context, heres the definition from Merriam-Webster: coprophagy: the feeding on or eating of dung or excrement that is normal behavior among many insects, birds, and other animals but in man is a symptom of some forms of insanity Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Misused Words category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:Has vs. HadRules for Capitalization in Titles6 Foreign Expressions You Should Know